Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270358›Full record

Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Uptake of orally administered tranexamic acid in women during active labor: A pilot intervention study on prophylactic treatment of postpartum hemorrhage.

Gita Strindfors, Pelle G Lindqvist, Margit Endler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gita StrindforsDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-6757
Pelle G LindqvistDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-8235
Margit EndlerSödersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-6455

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2019-06121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Several studies have confirmed that tranexamic acid is effective in treating postpartum hemorrhage once started, but its prophylactic effect is under debate. As of now, most studies involve intravenous administration, and the uptake of tranexamic acid in women during active labor is unknown. This is a pilot study in preparation for a larger randomized controlled trial on the prophylactic effect of oral tranexamic acid on postpartum hemorrhage. The study aims to assess the uptake of oral tranexamic acid during active labor. MATERIAL AND

methodsOur study is a pilot intervention study. The study population consisted of 51 women ≥36 gestational weeks with planned vaginal delivery at Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, from December 2022 through February 2023. The participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 2 g of tranexamic acid as an oral solution, tablets, effervescent tablets, or 1 g of intravenous tranexamic acid, near full cervical dilatation. Blood samples were taken before and 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 min after tranexamic acid administration. Plasma concentration of tranexamic acid was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mean values were compared between groups using analysis of variance. Our main outcome measures were time to therapeutic level, duration in therapeutic interval, and maximum plasma concentration of tranexamic acid.

resultsTherapeutic level (5.0 mg/L) was reached at the 2-h time point for oral (7.11 ± 3.31 mg/L) and the 30-min time point for intravenous forms (30.6 ± 15.0 mg/L). Duration in therapeutic intervals for oral and intravenous forms was 6 and 3.5 h (p < 0.007). Peak plasma concentrations for oral and intravenous forms were 10.2 ± 3.9 mg/L and 30.6 ± 15.0 mg/L, respectively (p < 0.001). Time-to-therapeutic level (p = 0.08), duration in therapeutic interval (p = 0.92), or peak concentration (p = 0.73) did not differ between oral forms. Overall, 37 women (88%) found the intake of oral tranexamic acid during active labor acceptable.

conclusionsAll oral forms of tranexamic acid show similar and adequate uptake when administered during labor. Uptake is lower and slower compared with intravenous administration, but the duration in the therapeutic interval is longer.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsLabor, ObstetricPostpartum HemorrhageTranexamic AcidAdministration, OralAdultFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic Acidanalysisplasma concentrationpostpartum hemorrhagetherapeutic usestranexamic acid

Identifiers

PMID40270358
PMCPMC12144602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.