ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease of the Forearm.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra Short Osteotomy With Mortise-Tenon Diaphyseal Prosthesis Reconstruction for Forearm Metastases: A Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic bone disease and pathological fractures in the long bones of the forearm are rare. The methods and outcomes of surgical treatment for these fractures have not been adequately described.
aimsTo analyze the outcome of surgery for pathological fractures of the forearm. METHODS AND
resultsRetrospective study of 30 complete and impending pathological fractures (28 consecutive patients) in the forearm, operated on in a single tertiary center between 1986 and 2020. The most common malignancy was hematological disease (multiple myeloma and lymphoma). Most fractures (n = 19) were managed with plate and screw reconstruction. In some cases, simple curettage or segmental resections of the metastasis were performed. Local complications were noted in six operations, the most common one being tumor relapse seen in three patients. Most patients had good outcomes regarding restoration of function and pain relief. There were no secondary surgeries in segmental resection, and the function was near normal.
conclusionSurgical reconstruction of metastases in the long bones of the forearm usually results in a good functional outcome with an acceptable complication rate. Plate osteosynthesis is often indicated. Segmental excision can be reserved for dispensable parts of the ulna and radius, with excellent results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.