Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270353›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease of the Forearm.

Jennifer Sebghati, Panagiotis Tsagkozis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer SebghatiKarolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2101-747X
Panagiotis TsagkozisKarolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-2053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic bone disease and pathological fractures in the long bones of the forearm are rare. The methods and outcomes of surgical treatment for these fractures have not been adequately described.

aimsTo analyze the outcome of surgery for pathological fractures of the forearm. METHODS AND

resultsRetrospective study of 30 complete and impending pathological fractures (28 consecutive patients) in the forearm, operated on in a single tertiary center between 1986 and 2020. The most common malignancy was hematological disease (multiple myeloma and lymphoma). Most fractures (n = 19) were managed with plate and screw reconstruction. In some cases, simple curettage or segmental resections of the metastasis were performed. Local complications were noted in six operations, the most common one being tumor relapse seen in three patients. Most patients had good outcomes regarding restoration of function and pain relief. There were no secondary surgeries in segmental resection, and the function was near normal.

conclusionSurgical reconstruction of metastases in the long bones of the forearm usually results in a good functional outcome with an acceptable complication rate. Plate osteosynthesis is often indicated. Segmental excision can be reserved for dispensable parts of the ulna and radius, with excellent results.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, SpontaneousRadius FracturesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone PlatesFemaleForearmHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomebone metastasisforearmpathological fracturesurgery

Identifiers

PMID40270353
PMCPMC12018889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.