Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270332›Full record

ArticleHeadache

Beneficial effect of infiltration around the greater occipital nerve in cluster headache independent of modulation of the nociceptive blink reflex.

Willemijn C Naber, Paulien J van Tilborg, Martijn R Tannemaat, Marieke Niesters, Marieke D Hellinga, Roemer B Brandt, Rolf Fronczek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Willemijn C NaberDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9260-9336
Paulien J van TilborgDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-9233-0538
Martijn R TannemaatDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marieke NiestersDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marieke D HellingaDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roemer B BrandtDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2932-4872
Rolf FronczekDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

Hersenstichting
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND

backgroundWe aimed to explore the effect of greater occipital nerve (GON) infiltration on trigeminal transmission and its relation to clinical response. Infiltration of the GON with a local anesthetic and corticosteroids is effective in the treatment of both episodic (ECH) and chronic cluster headache (CCH). This effect is hypothesized to be due to delayed trigeminal transmission, resulting in a prolonged blink reflex with increased R2 latencies.

methodsIn this single-center, prospective cohort study, participants with either ECH or CCH were followed 12 weeks post-GON infiltration with daily e-diary monitoring and nociceptive blink reflex measurements at four timepoints: 30 min before infiltration; and 30 min, 1, and 4 weeks post-infiltration. The primary outcome was the R2 latency. Secondary outcomes were attack frequency and intensity. Data were collected between October 2020 and March 2023.

resultsA total of 33 participants were included in the primary analysis. No increased R2 latencies after GON infiltration were observed. When compared to baseline, daily attack frequency was significantly reduced during Week 1 (ECH: Δ -2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.43 to -0.64; CCH: Δ -1.36, 95% CI -1.93 to -0.71) and Week 4 (ECH: Δ -2.90, 95% CI -3.86 to -1.36; CCH: Δ -1.57, 95% CI -2.43 to -0.57), as was the attack intensity in Week 1 (ECH Δ -2.1, 95% CI -3.4 to -0.9; CCH: Δ -1.5, 95% CI -2.3 to -0.7) and Week 4 (ECH Δ -3.6, 95% CI -6.4 to -0.8; CCH: Δ -1.7, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.7) after GON infiltration compared to baseline. In all, 76% (25/33) of participants experienced a ≥30% reduction of their CH attacks and 27% (9/33) were attack free in Week 4. Unexpectedly, the R2 latency slightly decreased, but only in a solitary measurement ipsilateral to the infiltration side 4 weeks post-infiltration. No correlation between R2 latencies and clinical response were observed.

conclusionThe observed neurophysiological alterations were minor and were not associated with any clinical outcome. Therefore, despite rigorous analysis of multiple neurophysiological parameters in a relatively large patient sample, we did not find any evidence that the clinical response of GON infiltration is caused by reduced-or modulated-transmission of the trigeminal nerve or the trigeminal cervical complex. Although effective, the mechanism of the GON infiltration thus remains enigmatic.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBlinkingCluster HeadacheSpinal NervesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTrigeminal NerveAnesthetics, Localblink reflexcluster headachegreater occipital nervegreater occipital nerve infiltrationheadache

Identifiers

PMID40270332
PMCPMC12638508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.