Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270265›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025

Motivations for choosing "home" as one's preferred place of death: A scoping review.

Taylor D Pike, Matthew J Sargent, Shannon Freeman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taylor D PikeFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Matthew J SargentCentre for Technology Adoption for Aging in the North, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Shannon FreemanCentre for Technology Adoption for Aging in the North, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-6696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile dying at home is often described as desirable, to our knowledge, no reviews have focused specifically on people's reasons for wanting to die at home. This review describes the breadth of what is known about motivations, attitudes, ideas, and reasons underlying the decision to choose "home" as one's preferred placed of death.

methodsThis review was guided by a scoping review methodology following a five-stage approach including: (1) identify the research question, (2) identify relevant studies, (3) select studies based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, (4) chart the data, and (5) summarize and report the results.

resultsSeventeen articles were identified that met inclusion/exclusion criteria and discussed motivations underlying people's desires to die at home. Thirty-five percent of studies were from Canada ( SIGNIFICANCE OF

resultsThe many interconnected reasons that lead people to choose a home death vary, as individuals have a range of motivations for choosing to die at home, which are highly influenced by contextual and cultural factors. Ultimately, this review will provide a comprehensive description of factors which may inform end-of-life planning, highlighting needs to be considered when planning the preferred location of a death.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathHome Care ServicesMotivationPatient PreferenceHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal Caredeathdyingend-of-life planninghospicePalliative

Identifiers

PMID40270265
PMCPMC13166685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.