ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
The communication experiences of persons referred to specialist palliative care services and their carers: A descriptive phenomenological study.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEffective communication during specialist palliative care (PC) referral is linked to improved health outcomes. Initiating a conversation about PC is difficult and poor communication can lead to stigma. The aim of this descriptive phenomenological study was to explore the communication experiences of persons referred to specialist PC services and their carers and explore strategies to improve such experiences.
methodsPurposive sampling was used to recruit 17 participants who were either receiving specialist PC and/or caring for someone who was receiving specialist PC. Participants were recruited from a hospice. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsFour themes were identified: (i) The why, who, what, when, where, and how of PC referral; (ii) initial thoughts and feelings about referral to PC; (iii) enhancing the communication of PC referral; and (iv) addressing practical needs during PC referral. Participants were referred either through their general practitioner or oncologist. Initially, participants linked PC referral to death. This perception changed when participants started availing of the services. Compassion, empathy, hope, privacy, in-person communication, individualized referral, and information dosing were identified as building blocks for effective communication. Participants stressed the importance of raising public awareness of PC and addressing the practical needs of individuals being referred. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsThe communication of PC referral should be tailored to meet the individual needs of patients and carers. Delivering clear and simple information is important to help patients and carers understand and accept the referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.