ArticleHaematologica2025
A simplified frailty score predicts outcome in curatively treated older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Novel Geriatric Risk Score for Prognostication in Older Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Article
- AVD for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
- AVD is an effective chemotherapy backbone in first-line treatment of older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of treatment-related and geriatric factors in older patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma: A real-life cohort study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Evolution of therapeutic paradigms in Hodgkin lymphoma: from "cure-oriented" to "functional cure".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Response to Comment on: "A simplified frailty score predicts outcome in curatively treated older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma".Haematologica · 2025Article
- Article
- Fit, unfit, or frail? Now easier to tell for Hodgkin lymphoma.Haematologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have lower tolerance and inferior outcomes after standard chemotherapy regimens. To identify patient-derived indicators of frailty associated with outcome, we retrospectively analyzed patient and disease characteristics, treatment and outcome in a Norwegian population-based cohort of older (≥60 years) patients with cHL diagnosed 2000-2015. We included 279 patients (median age 69 years, range 60-90) treated with curative intent, defined as any typical cHL regimen with ≥50% standard doxorubicin dose in the first cycle. In this Norwegian cohort, treatment-related mortality was 8%, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0-9.3) and 8.7 years (95% CI: 7.0-10.4), respectively. Multivariable analyses identified patient-derived prognostic factors working independently of stage, histology, and International Prognostic Score. We derived a frailty index ranging from 0-3 with one point each for age ≥70 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≥2, and a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in Geriatrics score ≥8. Patients were categorized as fit (score 0, 34% of patients), unfit (score 1-2, 60%), and frail (score 3, 7%), with 5-year PFS of 74%, 49%, and 11%, and 5-year OS of 86%, 52%, and 22%, respectively. The proposed frailty score was validated in an external cohort of 792 similarly selected patients from the Swedish Lymphoma Register, where comorbidities were scored based on the Charlson comorbidity index (0-2 vs. 3 or higher). In this comprehensive study, we develop a frailty score for elderly cHL patients to inform clinical decisions and prospective trials evaluating selective therapies for older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.