ArticleHaematologica2025
Prophylactic and pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: validation of current recommendations and proposal of a modified outcome assessment.
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Time dependent outcomes modeling in a real-world analysis of the molecular tumor board at University Cancer Center Hamburg (2016-2022).The oncologist · 2026Article
- Donor lymphocyte infusions for recurrence of myeloid neoplasms after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of hypomethylating agents and BCL2 inhibitors.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Current and emerging maintenance strategies after stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with acute leukemias.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- No clear benefit of cellular therapy consolidation for patients achieving remission after post-HCT AML relapse.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prophylactic and pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (pro/preDLI) is used to prevent hematologic relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Given the lack of prospective trials, outcome reports, risk factor analyses and published recommendations on DLI administration have had to rely on information from registry studies, frequently limited by inconsistent reporting and missing data. We, therefore, performed an extensive review of the charts of recipients of pro/preDLI in two German centers to investigate the clinical applicability of current guidelines in a well-defined cohort. Furthermore, as the outcome after pro/preDLI is unsatisfactorily described by conventional parameters, we constructed a model for "treatment success", defined as leukemia-free survival without intensive immunosuppressive treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Eighty-three patients had received DLI: proDLI (N=36), preDLI for incomplete chimerism (N=27) and preDLI for persisting minimal residual disease/molecular relapse (N=20). According to current guidelines concerning initial T-cell doses and timing of DLI, 42% of patients had received DLI as recommended (standard intensity), whereas 30% had received DLI at lower cell doses and/or at a later timepoint (low intensity) and 28% had received DLI at higher cell doses and/or at an earlier timepoint (high intensity). Two-year rates of overall survival, leukemia-free survival, relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality within the entire cohort were 80%, 67%, 27% and 8%, respectively. One-year rates of high-grade acute/chronic GvHD were 34% and 27%, respectively, among all patients and 53% and 33% after high-intensity DLI. One-year treatment success rates were 72% and 69% after low- and standard-intensity DLI, respectively, in contrast to 34% after high-intensity DLI. Apart from advanced disease at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, high-intensity DLI was the major risk factor for lower overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=6.12), lower leukemia-free survival (HR=5.43), higher acute GvHD (HR=2.51), and lower treatment success (HR=0.41), supporting adherence to current recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.