Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270206›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2025

Prophylactic and pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: validation of current recommendations and proposal of a modified outcome assessment.

Giuliano Filippini Velázquez, Jan Frederic Weller, Anna Rubeck, Tobias Arndt, Stefan Schiele, Markus Mezger, Claudia Lengerke, Wolfgang Bethge, Martin Trepel, Gernot Müller and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giuliano Filippini VelázquezSection for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Research, Department of Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Augsburg, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Comprehensive Cancer Center, Augsburg.
Jan Frederic WellerDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Center for Oncology, II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Anna RubeckDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg.
Tobias ArndtDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg.
Stefan SchieleDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg.
Markus MezgerDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen.
Claudia LengerkeDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen.
Wolfgang BethgeDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen.
Martin TrepelSection for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Research, Department of Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Augsburg, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Comprehensive Cancer Center, Augsburg.
Gernot MüllerDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg.
Maximilian ChristopeitDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Center for Oncology, II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Christoph SchmidSection for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Research, Department of Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Augsburg, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Comprehensive Cancer Center, Augsburg. Christoph.Schmid@uk-augsburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophylactic and pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusion (pro/preDLI) is used to prevent hematologic relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Given the lack of prospective trials, outcome reports, risk factor analyses and published recommendations on DLI administration have had to rely on information from registry studies, frequently limited by inconsistent reporting and missing data. We, therefore, performed an extensive review of the charts of recipients of pro/preDLI in two German centers to investigate the clinical applicability of current guidelines in a well-defined cohort. Furthermore, as the outcome after pro/preDLI is unsatisfactorily described by conventional parameters, we constructed a model for "treatment success", defined as leukemia-free survival without intensive immunosuppressive treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Eighty-three patients had received DLI: proDLI (N=36), preDLI for incomplete chimerism (N=27) and preDLI for persisting minimal residual disease/molecular relapse (N=20). According to current guidelines concerning initial T-cell doses and timing of DLI, 42% of patients had received DLI as recommended (standard intensity), whereas 30% had received DLI at lower cell doses and/or at a later timepoint (low intensity) and 28% had received DLI at higher cell doses and/or at an earlier timepoint (high intensity). Two-year rates of overall survival, leukemia-free survival, relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality within the entire cohort were 80%, 67%, 27% and 8%, respectively. One-year rates of high-grade acute/chronic GvHD were 34% and 27%, respectively, among all patients and 53% and 33% after high-intensity DLI. One-year treatment success rates were 72% and 69% after low- and standard-intensity DLI, respectively, in contrast to 34% after high-intensity DLI. Apart from advanced disease at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, high-intensity DLI was the major risk factor for lower overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=6.12), lower leukemia-free survival (HR=5.43), higher acute GvHD (HR=2.51), and lower treatment success (HR=0.41), supporting adherence to current recommendations.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLymphocyte TransfusionMyelodysplastic SyndromesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40270206
PMCPMC12485326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.