ArticleApplied spectroscopy2025
Interlaboratory Study to Minimize Wavelength Calibration Uncertainty Due to Peak Fitting of Reference Material Spectra in Raman Spectroscopy.
Article in Applied spectroscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy is a powerful characterization technique with increasing applications that would greatly benefit from data harmonization. Several standards deal with calibration in Raman spectroscopy, but no detailed procedure covers the complete calibration of an instrument, including both spectral axes, from reference material spectra generation to data processing. Moreover, the type of reference materials, the quality of the recorded spectra and the choice of the fitting functions are critical for obtaining precise and reliable reference data for calibration. This report describes the challenges and importance of peak fitting for Raman signal calibration based on an interlaboratory study with 10 different instruments. Spectra of neon emission, silicon, calcite, and polystyrene were fitted using common peak shapes, observing that Gaussian, Pearson IV, Voigt, and Voigt shapes are preferred for these materials, respectively. An analysis of the effect on the fitting of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) recommends a minimum value of 100 for a Raman peak if it should be used to calibrate a Raman instrument. Some factors that might affect the peak shape of the Raman signal, such as the physical and chemical properties of the sample, the nature of the electronic transitions, the instrument response and the spectral resolution are discussed. The results highlight the role of peak fitting analysis in improving the quality and reliability of Raman spectra calibration and, thus, enhancing data transfer and comparability, especially for handheld and portable Raman analyzers, as well as applications based on quantification, multivariate data analysis, and other complex processing steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.