Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270084›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Optimization of microwave hyperthermia system for focused breast cancer treatment: A study using realistic digital breast phantoms.

Burak Acar, Tuba Yilmaz, Ali Yapar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Burak AcarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tuba YilmazDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali YaparDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 118S074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrowave breast hyperthermia is a noninvasive treatment method for breast cancer that utilizes microwave energy (ME) sources to raise tissue temperatures above 42 PURPOSE: In this work, we propose an approach to optimize the microwave hyperthermia system, employing phase and amplitude modulation techniques to concentrate the electric field at the center of a malignant tumor within a breast medium. The approach uses line sources arranged in a circular pattern around realistic breast models. The method begins by determining the phase, followed by adjusting the amplitudes of each source in order to maximize the total electric field at the tumor's center. The goal is to maximize the electric field at the tumor center while minimizing the optimization cost and complexity.

methodsSimulations are performed at 4 GHz frequency using two different types of digital breast phantoms (fatty and dense breasts) as test beds. The algorithm is tested by using three quantities; that is, the electric field distribution, the power density distribution, and the temperature distribution inside the whole breast region. The electric field and power density are calculated using an in-house method of moments (MoM) algorithm, while the temperature distributions are obtained with computer simulation technology (CST) software. To further evaluate the method with quantitative measures of success, thermal indices are calculated for each phantom and method.

resultsThe specific absorbtion rate (SAR) results and corresponding temperature distributions for each breast type and optimization demonstrate that effective focusing is achieved in both cases. However, the combined phase-amplitude optimization provides more precise focusing by eliminating hot spots. Among thermal indices, the TC75 and T90 values obtained from the phase-amplitude combined optimization for both breast types outperform the results found in the literature. The T50 values obtained using the combined optimization are above 42

conclusionsThis study presents an optimization method for focusing ME within breast tissue, performed in two steps: first phase optimization, followed by amplitude optimization. The electric field calculations are performed using both the MoM and Finite Difference Time Domain methods. The technique is numerically tested on two realistic breast models, with thermal indices calculated for each phantom and optimization process. Results show T90 values exceeding 40

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedMicrowavesPhantoms, ImagingBreastFemaleHumansantenna excitation optimizationbreast cancermicrowave hyperthermia

Identifiers

PMID40270084
PMCPMC12149706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.