Observational studyOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Enhancing the effects of nusinersen with cybernic treatment using Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) in spinal muscular atrophy: a real-world case series and exploratory cohort analysis.
Observational study in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNusinersen therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) provides significant functional improvement when initiated pre-symptomatically or early in life. However, challenges remain in diverse populations with longer disease duration. In Japan, innovative cybernic therapy with the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) is gaining traction in treating neuromuscular diseases. This observational study investigated whether combining HAL therapy with nusinersen and conventional physiotherapy yields functional improvements in SMA, irrespective of disease duration or age. Functional improvement indicators included the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE) and Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) scores, and the 2-minute walk test (2MWT), measured 15 months post-nusinersen initiation. A cohort analysis of a selected case series was conducted.
resultsTwelve patients with SMA type 2 or 3 who met the criteria of being able to walk with a hoist and began nusinersen treatment > 40 months post-disease onset were selected for longitudinal clinical assessment. Cohort 1 (n = 5, mean age 36.0 years) underwent HAL therapy, while Cohort 2 (n = 7, 24.6 years) did not. Baseline characteristics, except mean age, were similar across cohorts. In Cohort 1, the period from baseline (nusinersen initiation) to HAL therapy ranged from 0 to 8.8 months. HFMSE scores improved in both cohorts at 15 months; the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 4.7 points (2.2, 7.3) in Cohort 1 and 2.9 points (0.7, 5.1) in Cohort 2. Clinically meaningful improvement of 3.0 points in HFSME was exceeded by four of five patients in Cohort 1 and three of seven in Cohort 2. The LSM change from baseline in RULM was 2.2 points (95% CI 1.0, 3.3) in Cohort 1, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 0.5-1.0 points, but remained unchanged in Cohort 2 due to ceiling effects (- 0.2; -1.5, 1.2; p = 0.016). The LSM change from baseline in the 2MWT had improved in Cohort 1 (34.57 m; 95% CI 4.57, 64.57), but not in Cohort 2 (- 3.86; -37.75, 30.03).
conclusionsIn patients with SMA type 2 and 3, clinically meaningful improvements in multiple indicators were observed when HAL was combined with nusinersen, even when treatment commenced many years after disease onset. REGISTRATION: jRCT1090220400 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1090220400 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.