Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270040›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2025

Potential of coconut oil as a mosquito repellent.

Shiho Hara, Micheal Teron Pillay, Toshihiko Sunahara, Masaru Nagashima, Lucy Atieno Okech, Chiaki Tsurukawa, Yasuhiko Kamiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shiho HaraTropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. shiho.hara01@gmail.com.
Micheal Teron PillayDepartment of Vector Ecology and Environment, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. micheal@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Toshihiko SunaharaDepartment of Vector Ecology and Environment, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masaru NagashimaInstitute of Developing Economies Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO), Tokyo, Japan.
Lucy Atieno OkechNagasaki Kenya Institution, Homabay, Kenya.
Chiaki TsurukawaDepartment of Vector Ecology and Environment, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yasuhiko KamiyaTropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNaturally derived products have become popular as a mosquito repellent in addition to mosquito nets and chemical repellents. Coconut-derived fatty acids have demonstrated repellent properties against various blood-feeding arthropods, including mosquitoes. Daily use moisturizers and body soaps containing coconut have displayed some repellent effect against mosquitoes. However, no studies have been conducted on coconut oil specifically, and the effects of pure coconut oil still remain unknown in the western Kenya region.

methodsIn this study, we investigated the effect of coconut oil on decreasing mosquito bites in a laboratory and field setting. Using Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes, the laboratory experiment compared coconut oil treated and non-treated membranes on a Hemotek blood feeding device. In the cross-sectional study in western Kenya, we investigated bite counts among 490 children, 5 years and under. Descriptive analysis, simple, multiple and mixed regression models were employed. The outcome was the number of mosquito bite marks, the primary explanatory variable was skin cream types, in addition to demographic, environmental, behavioral and socio-economic variables.

resultsCoconut oil significantly reduced mosquito blood feeding, with a pooled Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio of 0.06, a Mantel-Haenszel chi-square statistic of 79.82 (p = 0.01), and an average blood-feeding rate of 1% compared to 31% in the control group. The mixed model identified significant factors influencing mosquito bite counts while accounting for village-level random effects. Coconut oil users experienced 15% reduction in bites (p = 0.01) compared to synthetic creams users. High and medium cream application frequencies reduced bites by 57% (p < 0.001) and 17% (p = 0.007), respectively. Late cream application and late net entry significantly increased bite counts by 41% (p < 0.001) and 53% (p < 0.001), respectively. In addition, higher temperatures from the preceding 2 weeks in the region was associated with a 26% (p = 0.003) increase in bite counts.

conclusionsThese findings underscore the protective impact of cream application and timing and net use timing, as well as environmental temperature influences on bite outcomes. Particularly, the effect of coconut oil in decreasing mosquito bites and its potential as an alternative repellent has been observed in both laboratory and field settings.

Indexed as

Coconut oilMosquito biteNatural repellentVectors

Identifiers

PMID40270040
PMCPMC12016410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.