Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270039›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2025

Effects of rapid chest compression technique on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures in acute neurocritical patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Ricardo Miguel Rodrigues-Gomes, Ángela Prieto Campo, Rosa Martinez Rolán, Miguel Gelabert-González

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03609866 (the Effects of Manual Thoracic Compression Technique in Intracranial Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Cerebral Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03609866 nacompletednot on this map

the Effects of Manual Thoracic Compression Technique in Intracranial Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Cerebral Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsAcute Brain InjuryArmsrapid thoracic compression technique, inferior limb passive mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo Miguel Rodrigues-GomesFacultade de Medicina, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. ric.mr.gomes@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-3717
Ángela Prieto CampoStatistics and Methodology Unit, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-7718
Rosa Martinez RolánNeurosurgical Service, Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital, Vigo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-5649
Miguel Gelabert-GonzálezDepartment of Surgery, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9462-0045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome studies refer to the increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) with chest physiotherapy techniques but without any randomized controlled trials that evaluate the safety of the manual rapid chest compression technique in patients with severe acute brain injuries on invasive mechanical ventilation. Our research question examines whether intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures significantly change during rapid chest compression technique.

methodsA prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial of acute neurocritical patients under mechanical ventilation was performed. The intervention group was subjected to rapid chest compression, and the control group received mechanical passive inferior limbs mobilization. The outcomes were intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, blood partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and inspiratory and expiratory peak flows.

resultsBetween May 2021 and December 2023, 50 patients (aged 56.3 years), 66% females, were randomized into two groups (25 controls and 25 interventions). The ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) did not significantly differ between the groups at any of the studied times. Intragroup analysis revealed significant decreases in the ICP and CPP in the intervention group, with posterior recovery in both groups. The CPP significantly decreased in the control group but did not reach the preintervention values at the last measurement time. PaCO

conclusionThe rapid chest compression technique did not increase the ICP during its application or even 30 min after it. The ICP showed a slight significant decrease during the application of the rapid chest compression technique but reached the previous values in the posterior 30 min. CPP had a similar behavior but did not completely recover in both groups.

trial registrationNCT03609866. Registered on 08/01/2018.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationIntracranial PressureAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialSingle-Blind MethodAcute brain injuryCerebral perfusion pressureChest physiotherapyIntracranial pressureRespiratory physiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40270039
PMCPMC12020190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.