ArticlePlant methods2025
Pest detection in dynamic environments: an adaptive continual test-time domain adaptation strategy.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DFSNet: directional feature aggregation and shape-aware supervision for eggplant pest and disease detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- EDDet: efficient deep-fusion and dynamic optimization for small target detection in eggplant diseases.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- RDW-YOLO: A Deep Learning Framework for Scalable Agricultural Pest Monitoring and Control.Insects · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pest management is essential for agricultural production and food security, as pests can cause significant crop losses and economic impact. Early pest detection is key to timely intervention. While object detection models perform well on various datasets, they assume i.i.d. data, which is often not the case in diverse real-world environments, leading to decreased accuracy. To solve the problem, we propose the CrossDomain-PestDetect (CDPD) method, which is based on the YOLOv9 model and incorporates a test-time adaptation (TTA) framework. CDPD includes Dynamic Data Augmentation (DynamicDA), a Dynamic Adaptive Gate (DAG), and a Multi-Task Dynamic Adaptation Model (MT-DAM). Our DynamicDA enhances images for each batch by combining strong and weak augmentations. The MT-DAM integrates an object detection model with an image segmentation model, exchanging information through feature fusion at the feature extraction layer. During testing, test-time adaptation updates both models, continuing feature fusion during forward propagation. DAG adaptively controls the degree of feature fusion to improve detection capabilities. Self-supervised learning enables the model to adapt during testing to changing environments. Experiments show that without test-time adaptation, our method achieved a 7.6% increase in mAP50 over the baseline in the original environment and a 16.1% increase in the target environment. Finally, with test-time adaptation, the mAP50 score in the unseen target environment reaches 73.8%, which is a significant improvement over the baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.