ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
Global trends in artificial intelligence research in anesthesia from 2000 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in onco-anaesthesia: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Risk Prediction in Anesthesiology: A Bibliometric and Knowledge-Mapping Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Depth of anesthesia monitoring: Current evidence, clinical impact, and future directions.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence revolutionizing anesthesia management: advances and prospects in intelligent anesthesia technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterest in artificial intelligence (AI) research in anesthesia is growing rapidly. However, there is a lack of bibliometric analysis to measure and analyze global scientific publications in this field. The aim of this study was to identify the hotspots and trends in AI research in anesthesia through bibliometric analysis.
methodsEnglish articles and reviews published from 2000 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. The extracted data were summarized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel, and bibliometric analysis were conducted with VOSviewer software.
resultsAI research literature in anesthesia has exhibited rapid growth in recent years. The United States leads in the number of publications and citations, with Stanford University as the most prolific institution. Hyung-Chul Lee is the author with the highest number of publications. The journal Anesthesiology is highly recognized and authoritative in this field. Recent keywords include "musculoskeletal pain", "precision medicine", "stratification", "images", "mean arterial pressure", " enhanced recovery after surgery", "frailty", "telehealth", "postoperative delirium" and "postoperative mortality" indicating hot topics in AI research in anesthesia.
conclusionsPublications on AI research in the field of anesthesia have experienced rapid growth over the past two decades and are likely to continue increasing. Research areas such as depth of anesthesia (DOA) and drug infusion (including electroencephalography and deep learning), perioperative risk assessment and prediction (covering mean arterial pressure, frailty, postoperative delirium, and mortality), image classification and recognition (for applications such as ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, vascular access, and difficult airway assessment), and perioperative pain management (particularly musculoskeletal pain) have garnered significant attention. Additionally, topics such as precision medicine, enhanced recovery after surgery, and telehealth are emerging as new hotspots and future directions in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.