ArticleBMC health services research2025
"Our needs, our priorities, listen to us!" recommendations for improving HIV prevention and the cascade of care from people living with HIV in Manitoba, Canada: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The risk of HIV and HCV transmission in Canadians living with coinfection before, during, and after the COVID pandemic: A prospective cohort study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Canadian province of Manitoba has reported a 52% increase in HIV diagnoses during the past 5 years. Females are disproportionately affected by HIV and multiple intersecting health and social challenges, including houselessness, injection drug use, sexually transmitted and blood borne infections, and mental health conditions. Program and service development often ignore people's complex lived experiences. Our aim was to describe recommendations made by people living with HIV (PLHIV) to inform a person-centred HIV cascade of care valuing the needs and ideas from PLHIV.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted between October 2022 and May 2023. Thirty-two women, men, and gender-diverse participants completed a semi-structured interview. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo 12, deploying thematic analysis to understand major themes related to recommendations to care. This manuscript focuses on questions related to recommendations for the HIV cascade of care.
resultsRecommendations fell within two major themes: 'Meeting people where they are at' and an HIV educational strategy. The first theme included three main categories to make HIV services more accessible. (1) psychological (social programming, peer support during diagnosis, increased mental health services), (2) biomedical (HIV outreach, HIV services outside 9 -5 h, specialized care outside metropolitan areas, universal coverage for HIV medicines), and (3) social (transportation support, emergency housing, financial support) supports. The HIV educational strategy included five major categories: (1) physical posters and billboards in highly transited areas; (2) community meetings with peer-led education; (3) comprehensive sex education in schools; (4) training primary healthcare providers on stigma and discrimination; (5) and social media campaigns to reach younger audiences. We report on gender differences for recommendations where they arose. The themes described by PLHIV suggest a need to implement HIV care delivery models that will connect and maintain people in HIV care in Manitoba.
conclusionsThis study provides practical and person-centred strategies that could bridge the barriers PLHIV face when accessing and remaining in HIV care and expanding education and prevention about HIV in Manitoba.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.