ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Qualitative changes in clinical records after implementation of pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program: a text mining analysis.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential for optimizing antimicrobial use, but many medium-sized hospitals lack infectious disease (ID) specialists. Ward pharmacists can contribute to ASPs, but the qualitative changes in their practice patterns after ASP implementation remains unclear. We aimed to explore the potential of text mining as a novel methodology to evaluate changes in ward pharmacist antimicrobial management practices after ASP implementation in a medium-sized hospital without ID physicians.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational analysis of data documented in clinical records by ward pharmacists in a 313-bed community hospital from April 2014 to March 2022. The ASP team conducted weekly reviews of targeted patients, provided feedback to physicians, and shared recommendations with ward pharmacists who then collaborated to optimize antimicrobial therapy. Using Python-based text mining with standardized technical terms and compound word extraction, we performed morphological analysis, co-occurrence network analysis, and hierarchical clustering to evaluate documentation patterns before and after ASP implementation in April 2018. Co-occurrence relationships were assessed using Dice coefficients (threshold, ≥ 0.3), and communities were detected using the Louvain algorithm. Changes in documentation patterns were compared using Fisher's exact test.
resultsThe analysis included 1,353 pre-ASP and 5,155 post-ASP clinical records containing antimicrobial-related terms, which increased from 3.12 to 7.81% of the total pharmacy records. New strong co-occurrence relationships emerged in the post-ASP period for several laboratory parameters (c-reactive protein, 0.646; estimated glomerular filtration rate, 0.594; and white blood cell count, 0.582). Network analysis revealed a shift from medication-focused communities (Medication Review, Prescription Verification, and Patient Education) to infection-focused communities (Infection Assessment, Microbiological Review, and Severe Infection Management). Although Antimicrobial Management was consistently used in both periods (odds ratio [OR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.20), cross-tabulation analysis increased significantly in Laboratory Monitoring (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.39-1.78) and Infection Assessment (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.85-2.36).
conclusionsThis pilot application of text mining demonstrated potential as a novel methodology for objectively evaluating qualitative changes in clinical practice patterns following ASP implementation, successfully identifying shifts in pharmacists' documentation focus and providing a foundation for future multi-center validation studies across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.