ArticleInjury epidemiology2025
The effect of child access prevention laws on adolescent suicide: a negative control approach.
Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Firearm Storage and Firearm Suicide.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent publications on Child Access Prevention (CAP) laws suggest substantial protective effects on adolescent firearm suicide. However, these studies have also found comparable protective effect estimates on adolescent non-firearm suicide and adult firearm suicide, which may indicate residual confounding. Here we apply bias analysis techniques to assess the effects of CAP laws while accounting for potential unmeasured sources of bias using a negative control approach.
methodUsing established bias formulas, we bias-adjust previously published point estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) assuming that an arbitrary confounder biases all suicide-related effect estimates and that adolescent non-firearm suicide and adult firearm suicide are negative controls. Negative controls are outcomes or populations that prior subject matter suggests should not be meaningfully affected by the exposure and can be used to better understand and sometimes account for bias in the primary exposure-outcome relationship.
resultsAfter bias adjustments, effect estimates were attenuated, with many of the confidence intervals including the null. Assuming that adolescent non-firearm suicide is a negative control outcome and taking a published point estimate as the bias parameter, the bias-adjusted effect estimate for adolescent firearm suicide decreased from an incidence rate ratio of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.97) to 0.95 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.07). When adult firearm suicide was used as the negative control, the bias-adjusted estimate was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.03).
conclusionOur findings suggest that CAP laws may have had a smaller public health impact on adolescent suicide than previously estimated. Given the strong evidence that reducing access to firearms can prevent suicide deaths, and that secure storage helps reduce access for many children, our findings underscore the need to continue to identify and promote effective ways to motivate adults to make household firearms inaccessible to children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.