ArticleBMC research notes2025
Using LDpred2 to adapt polygenic risk score techniques for methylation score creation.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study sought to determine if the R package LDpred2, designed for polygenic risk score creation for genome-wide association studies using summary statistics, could be adapted for deriving DNA methylation scores from methylome-wide association studies. Recognizing that linkage disequilibrium, used as prior in LDpred2, does not apply to methylation, we explored co-methylated regions and topologically associating domains as alternative structural priors for correlation between methylation sites. A genomic sliding-window approach was also tested. The performance of the LDpred2-based models was evaluated on methylation data from schizophrenia and control samples (N = 1,227).
resultsLDpred2 models employing topologically associating domains and sliding window clusters as priors performed similarly to existing methods, explaining approximately 3.6% of schizophrenia phenotypic variance. The co-methylated regions model underperformed due to insufficient clustering of probes. The similarity in performance between the model using topologically associating domains and a null model consisting of random clusters suggests that the structural information provided by these domains enhances performance only marginally. In conclusion, while LDpred2 can be adapted for methylation data, it does not substantially enhance methylation score performance over existing methods, and the choice of structural prior may not be a critical factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.