ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring the impact of interaction dynamics and professional capacity and development on cognitive medical errors: a multiple-case study of healthcare professionals in Jordan.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAddressing cognitve medical errors (MEs) and their contributing factors has emerged as a crucial factor in enhancing patient safety and attaining improved clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of interaction dynamics and professional capability and development on cognitive MEs (i.e., mistakes, slips, or lapses) from the perspectives of healthcare professionals in Jordan.
methodsA multiple-case study design was employed with a cross-sectional approach. Our study investigated three prominent Jordanian hospitals in the northern region (government, private, and teaching) through a pretested, valid, and reliable survey. Using a convenience sampling, 400 participants from three occupational categories, including physicians, nurses, and clinical managers were invloved. The relationships among the study variables were examined through structural equation modeling (SEM) following Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) conducted using AMOS software.
resultsThe results of CFA demonstrated that the model fit indices are acceptable (RMSEA = 0.069; CFI = 0.901; Chisq/df = 2.92; p <.05). The SEM analysis revealed a significant positive association between gaps in professional capacity and development, which comprises three subscales: training needs, continuous medical education, and skills, abilities, and competencies of healthcare professionals, and cognitive MEs (β = 0.40; p <.05). In contrast, a significant negative correlation was found between interaction dynamics among healthcare professionals, including two subscales: interpersonal communication, and teamwork and mutual support, and cognitive MEs (β = - 0.21; p <.05).
conclusionOur findings advocate for fostering a hospital culture that consolidates efforts to prioritize patient care coordination, and teamwork cohesion, while also minimizing gaps in unmet needs for training and continuing education, and addressing shortcomings in the skills and job competence of healthcare professionals as essential proactive steps to migirate cognitive MEs in Jordanian hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.