ArticleThyroid research2025
Are liquid levothyroxine formulations comparable? The LETI study.
Article in Thyroid research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of tablet versus liquid ethanol-free Levothyroxine in thyroidectomised patients.Endocrine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiquid ethanol-containing levothyroxine (e-LT4) is known to circumvent malabsorption induced by food, drugs, or pathological conditions. Recently a new ethanol-free formulation of liquid levothyroxine (ef-LT4) has been commercialized. No studies have compared e-LT4 with ef-LT4. The aim of the present study is to compare thyroid hormone profile in patients treated with e-LT4 and ef-LT4. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively retrieved thyroid hormonal profile and clinical data of 48 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism who had been on stable treatment with an e- LT4 formulation at the same dosage for at least one year and who decided to switch to ef-LT4 for tasting issue.
resultsA significant increase in TSH levels was observed after 6 months on ef-LT4 treatment (2.5 ± 0.8 mIU/ml vs. 3.1 ± 1.0 mIU/ml, respectively, p < .001), while fT4 decreased [1.2 ng/dl (IQR 1.1-1.4) vs. 1.1 ng/dl (1.0-1.2), respectively, p = .047], maintaining the same dosage of LT4. In 31 patients, for whom data were available 12 months after the switch, TSH further increased (2.50 ± 0.9 mIU/ml at baseline vs 3.2 ± 0.9 mIU/ml after 6 months vs 3.5 ± 0.9 mIU/ml at 12 months, p < .001) and fT4 decreased [1.2 ng/dl (IQR 1.1-1.4) vs. 1.1 ng/dl (IQR 0.9-1.3) vs 1.0 ng/dl (IQR 0.9-1.1), p = .008].
conclusionef-LT4 formulation seems to be less effective compared to e-LT4 over time. However, further prospective cross-sectional studies, performed in large sets of patients, even on concomitant therapy with interfering drugs, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.