Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269938›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Simulating the overload of medical processes due to system failures during a cyberattack.

Markus Willing, Simon Ebbers, Christian Dresen, Marc Czolbe, Christoph Saatjohann, Sebastian Schinzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Markus Willing *Fraunhofer SIT, Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology SIT| ATHENE National Research Center for Applied Cybersecurity, Steinfurt, Germany. markus.willing@sit.fraunhofer.de.
Simon Ebbers *University of Applied Sciences Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Christian DresenUniversity of Applied Sciences Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Marc CzolbeUniversity of Applied Sciences Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Christoph SaatjohannUniversity of Applied Sciences Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Sebastian SchinzelFraunhofer SIT, Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology SIT| ATHENE National Research Center for Applied Cybersecurity, Steinfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today's medical IT is more and more connected and network or IT system outages may impact the quality of patient treatment. IT outages from cyberattacks are particularly worrisome if attackers focus on those medical IT devices that are critical for medical processes. However, medical processes are primarily documented for the hospital employees and not for analyzing the criticality of any given human or medical IT resource. This paper presents a generic model for realistic, patient-focused simulation of medical processes. The model allows the simulation of cyber incidents, focusing on device outages or overload situations like mass casualty incidents. Furthermore, we present a proof-of-concept tool that implements the described model, enabling end-users to simulate their processes. The tool offers the ability to run with low detailed data for overview purposes and highly detailed data for fine-grained simulation results. We perform different scenario simulations for a sample hospital, including the acute phase of a ransomware attack, negative performance impacts due to the implementation of cybersecurity measures, and emergency plans for mass casualty incidents. In each scenario, the respective simulation resulted in a quantitative statement of how these scenarios affect overall process performance and show possible key factors supporting decision-making. We use real-world data from a German trauma room to optimize and evaluate the process simulation.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityComputer SimulationMass Casualty IncidentsHumansMedical IT-securityMedical processesProcess simulationRisk management

Identifiers

PMID40269938
PMCPMC12016121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.