SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in adult non-traumatic emergency medicine: an umbrella review.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Point-of-care ultrasonography in High-Care Internal Medicine.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Characterization of pulmonary embolism events in patients with suspected pneumonia.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Frequency-domain band-pass filtering enhanced pulsation method for pulmonary embolism diagnosis and risk stratification: a two-center retrospective study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound : 2025 focused update of the 2012 recommendations.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Rethinking Congestion in Heart Failure from Volume Overload to Venous Pressure and Organ Disfunction with VExUS.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Utilizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism in a Young Male: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Saddle pulmonary embolism detected by transthoracic echocardiography-a case report.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Point-of-care ultrasound in hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Accuracy of electrical impedance tomography to detect perfusion defects in pulmonary embolism.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- The role of thoracic ultrasound in fluid management in critical care: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Bedside thoracic echography in ICU: new insights for acute circulatory and respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of Ultra-Dilute Iodine Contrast Agent in Dual-Layer Spectral CT for Pulmonary Artery ImagingCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical presentation of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can range from mild symptoms to severe shock, circulatory arrest and even death, thereby presenting with a significant high mortality when undiagnosed. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold-standard imaging modality for diagnosing PE, however, it has several practical limitations and is not widely available in low-income country settings. In this context, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a valuable bedside, non-invasive diagnostic tool. This meta-analysis assesses the accuracy of multi-organ POCUS for diagnosing PE in critical care settings. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing multi-organ POCUS with CTPA or ventilation-perfusion scans for PE diagnosis in critical care departments. Two reviewers independently completed search, data abstraction and conducted quality assessment with QUADAS-2 tool. Heterogeneity was examined with I
resultsFour studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 594 patients. The mean age of participants ranged from 55.2 to 71 years. Prevalence of PE ranged from 28 to 66.2%. CTPA was the primary reference standard used in most studies. Multi-organ POCUS for PE diagnosis demonstrated a pooled DOR of 25.3 (95% CI 4.43-82.9) with a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94; I
conclusionsMulti-organ POCUS has high diagnostic accuracy for PE diagnosis in critically ill patients. Further research is needed to validated these findings across different patient populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024614328.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.