ReviewBiomedical engineering online2025
Application and optimization of bioengineering strategies in facilitating tendon-bone healing.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly bio-adapted hydrogels for tendon-bone interface regeneration: Natural healing inspiration, design strategies, and biomedical potential.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Therapeutically Induced Modulation of Collagen I-to-III Ratio Three Weeks After Rabbit Achilles Tendon Full Transection.Biology · 2026Article
- Advanced engineering strategies for biomaterial scaffolds application in tendon-bone interface regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tendon-bone insertion trauma is prevalent in both rotator cuff and anterior cruciate ligament injuries, which are frequently encountered conditions in the field of sports medicine. The main treatment for such injuries is reconstructive surgery. The primary determinant impacting this process is the graft's capacity to integrate with the bone tunnel. In recent years, researchers have attempted to use a variety of methods to facilitate tendon-bone healing after reconstructive surgery. Such as the implantation of biological materials, cytokines and the local application of permanently differentiated cells from various sources. However, there are limitations to the efficacy of one therapy alone in facilitating tendon-bone healing. Therefore, researchers are trying to combine strategies to overcome this conundrum. At present, most studies are based on biomaterial combined with other therapeutic strategies for tissue repair and regeneration. Biomaterials mainly include the application of bioengineering scaffolds, hydrogels and bioabsorbable interference screws. By conducting a thorough review of relevant literature, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the present research progress in enhancing tendon-bone healing using biomaterials. Additionally, it explores the potential benefits of combining biomaterials with other approaches to promote tendon-bone healing. The ultimate goal is to offer insights for future basic research endeavors and establish a solid groundwork for advancing clinical applications in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.