ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Association between social determinants of health with the all-cause and cause-specific (cancer and cardio-cerebrovascular) mortality among the population with metabolic syndrome: NHANES 2005-2018.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the association between mortality and economic status in patients with metabolic syndrome in Korea: a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Screening cohort.Korean journal of family medicine · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Metabolic Syndrome Management and Attitudes Toward Using Digital Health Tools in Two Distinct Populations: Protocol for a Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Social determinants of health and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality on osteoarthritis adults in the USA: a national cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial determinants of health (SDOH) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are related, but their combined effect on mortality risk remains unclear.
methodsWe analyzed data from NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) cycles between 2005 and 2018. The composite SDOH score was calculated by summing the weighted scores for each SDOH, categorizing participants into four groups: Q1 (0-1), Q2 (2-3), Q3 (4) and Q4 (≥ 5). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between SDOH and mortality outcome. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were conducted to explore nonlinear relationships. Subgroup analyses assessed the consistency and robustness of the findings across various demographic and clinical factors.
resultsOf the 7,366 patients with MetS, 1,193 died, including 407 from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and 269 from cancer. Cox regression analyses, using fully adjusted Model 2, revealed that higher SDOH levels had increased hazards for all-cause mortality (HR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.87,3.12), cancer-related death (HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.54,3.89), and Cardio - cerebrovascular disease (HR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.79,3.84). Kaplan-Meier analyses further supported these findings, demonstrating that participants with higher SDOH scores had lower survival rates. Additionally, RCS modeling confirmed a linear relationship between SDOH and mortality, with no indication of a nonlinear relationship (P for nonlinear > 0.05).
conclusionOur findings indicate that adverse social determinants of health are strongly linked to an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with MetS. However, due to the observational and cross-sectional nature of this study, it is important to interpret these results as associations rather than implying any causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.