ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Brief verbal intervention to address inappropriate prescriptions of chinese patent medicines among western practitioners in primary health care (BRAVERY): a study protocol for an unannounced standardized patient experiment with a factorial design randomized controlled trial in China.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChinese patent medicines, produced using advanced pharmaceutical techniques and available in various forms, including powders, granules, tablets, pills, and capsules, finds extensive utilization among Western medicine practitioners in primary healthcare (WMP-PHC). However, the inappropriate overprescribing of these medicines has led to significant resource waste and raised considerable concerns. Therefore, we aim to address related knowledge gaps by employing unannounced standardized patients (USPs) as a method, for both measurement and intervention research. Specifically, in this paper, we present a study protocol that aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of brief verbal interventions (BVI) delivered by USPs, with the objective of improving the appropriate prescription of Chinese patent medicines. The study aims to equip patients with simple and easily implementable interventions to enhance the appropriate prescription of Chinese patent medicines. Furthermore, The findings from this study will provide valuable insights for policymakers, enabling them to comprehend the current levels of inappropriate Chinese patent medicines prescription and develop targeted policy interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will record a total of 576 encounters in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities across two cities in China. The data will be randomized using a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design randomized controlled trial (RCT), which includes factors such as financial incentives, knowledge and skills, prescribing habits, and patient expectation. USPs will collect data, including retrieving prescriptions and documenting the process of medical encounters. The primary outcome evaluation focuses on the appropriateness of Chinese patent medicines prescriptions. Secondary outcomes include the quality of the consultation process, patient satisfaction, cost information, service time, and appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions. Descriptive analysis will be performed for the survey results, and the difference in outcomes between interventions and control providers will be compared and statistically tested using generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study has been registered at the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300077913) on 23 November 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.