ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
A novel classification on degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis based on sagittal spino-pelvic alignment: should the thoracolumbar segments be intervened?
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere are few researches on characterizing the sagittal alignment of degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis (DTLK). In addition, the debate on the reasonable surgical strategies, for various patterns of DTLK, still continues. So, the study was to identify the features of DTLK, propose a novel classification of DTLK, and develop surgical strategies for this population.
methodsAn overall 245 patients diagnosed with DTLK combined with lumbar stenosis performed surgeries (acquired satisfied) were selected from January 2016 to December 2022. The spino-pelvic measurements thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) as well as the severe osteoporosis were recorded. To identify groups with similar spino-pelvic sagittal alignment parameters and clinical features, a 2-step cluster analysis was performed.
resultsClose relationships were found among the parameters. Four types of DTLK based on TLK and balance were classified with Type I: mild kyphosis and balance, Type II: mild kyphosis and imbalance, Type III: severe kyphosis and balance, Type IV: severe kyphosis and imbalance. The probability for imbalance with severe osteoporosis was 8.4 times higher than no osteoporosis (RR = 8.410). The probability for imbalance with PI-LL mismatch was 10 times higher than PI-LL matching (RR = 0.099 in Type II and RR = 0.103 in Type IV). For patients with DTLK, the TK was correlated with LL, PI-LL or PI in Type I to III group but not in Type IV group. Targeted treatment strategies for different types of patients was then addressed.
conclusionWe proposed a novel classifcation with four types of DTLK based on TLK and balance, followed by targeted treatment strategies for various types. Osteoporosis and lumbo-pelvic mismatch were risk factors for DTLK imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.