Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269850›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2025

Do dental students need sonography training? A prospective observational study.

Johannes Matthias Weimer, Maximilian Rink, Alexa Lippe, Lisa Zöll, Julian Künzel, Liv Lorenz, Christoph Sproll, Holger Buggenhagen, Lukas Müller, Lukas Pillong and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Johannes Matthias WeimerRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. weimer@uni-mainz.de.
Maximilian RinkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Alexa LippeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lisa ZöllPolyclinic for Periodontology and Tooth Preservation, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julian KünzelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Liv LorenzDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph SprollDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine- University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Holger BuggenhagenRudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Lukas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
Lukas PillongDepartment for Otorhinolaryngology and Head- and Neck-Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrbergerstraße 100, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Julia Weinmann-MenkeDepartment of Medicine I and Center for Immunotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anke HollinderbäumerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Bilal Al-NawasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSonography is a key diagnostic tool in oral and maxillofacial surgery and complements other imaging methods such as computer tomography or X-rays. While X-ray courses are integral to dentistry students' training, ultrasound diagnostics have not been integrated into undergraduate and postgraduate training. This study investigates whether there is a demand for undergraduate sonography training among dental students.

methodsAn online questionnaire was developed by a team of experts (dentistry, maxillofacial surgery, otorhinolaryngology, radiology, and didactics) based on the "Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (Cherries)". Multiple items addressed several topics using dichotomous ("yes"/ "no"), free text, and 7-level Likert answering formats (1 = not at all; 7 = fully and entirely). These included "personal data", "previous experience", "demand for ultrasound diagnostics in an undergraduate degree program", "desired topics of ultrasound training", "teaching methods", and "study materials". Dentistry students completed the questionnaire in the winter semester of 2023/24. The questionnaire's validity was assessed using factor analysis, reliability testing (Cronbach's Alpha, KR-20), and item discrimination.

results129 dental students participated (74% female). Many respondents (approx. 90%) were in higher semesters (6-10 semesters) and stated that they had not yet had any contact with ultrasound diagnostics (75%) and had not performed an ultrasound examination as yet (97%). The overall demand for ultrasound training was high (5.8 ± 1.3), particularly for the mandibular joint (6.3 ± 1.1), parotid gland (6.2 ± 1.0), submandibular gland, sublingual gland (6.1 ± 1.1), and floor of the mouth and tongue (5.9 ± 1.4) topics. Concerning the teaching methods and teaching materials, "practical training on a proband" (82%), and the use of "teaching scripts" (85%), "video instructions" (74%), "digital pathological experts" (66%), "e-learning" (62%), and "blended learning" (52%) were most desired. The questionnaire demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.93-0.95), strong factor structure (84% and 64% variance explained), and effective item discrimination.

conclusionThe data suggest a demand for undergraduate ultrasound training in dentistry. A practice-oriented, digitally supported training should be developed and implemented. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Education, DentalStudents, DentalAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyCurriculumDental educationDiagnostic imagingNeeds assessmentUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40269850
PMCPMC12020085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.