ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application of peer-assisted learning under the LSPPDM mode in resident clinical skill training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, several studies have explored the LSPPDM teaching model and peer-assisted learning to enhance teaching outcomes. Nevertheless, no study has integrated the LSPPDM model with peer mutual learning to explore its possible beneficial effects. The present study aims to explore the role of peer-assisted learning under the LSPPDM mode in improving the clinical competency of residents.
methodsA total of 129 residents of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University were selected as study subjects, including 68 residents in Grade 2022 as the control group (traditional teaching mode) and 61 residents in Grade 2023 as the experimental group (peer-assisted learning under the LSPPDM mode). To compare the grades of the basic clinical skills course and the after-department examination performance of the two groups of residents and to analyze the residents' evaluation of the effectiveness of their teaching, questionnaires were used.
resultsThe experimental group achieved a significantly higher total score in the clinical basic skills course (90.62) compared to the control group (86.23, P < 0.05). The average scores of theory, skills and case reports of the residents in the experimental group were 83.75, 90.98 and 89.74, respectively, which were higher than the 82.83, 89.11 and 87.41, respectively, in the control group. The difference between the skill score and case report score was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the theoretical score difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.476). Residents in the experimental group were significantly satisfied with each teaching session compared with the test value (4 points = satisfaction) (P < 0.001).
conclusionPeer-assisted learning under the LSPPDM mode significantly improves residents' clinical competency and achieves high satisfaction levels, offering valuable insights for optimizing clinical skill training in other hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.