Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269841›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025

Comparison of 5% sodium bicarbonate and 10% sodium chloride as contrast agents for lung perfusion with electrical impedance tomography: a prospective clinical study.

Yelin Gao, Yuecheng He, Yi Chi, Siyi Yuan, Songlin Wu, Yun Long, Zhanqi Zhao, Huaiwu He

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yelin Gao *State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuecheng He *State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yi Chi *State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Siyi YuanState Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Songlin WuState Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yun LongState Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhanqi ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huaiwu HeState Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. tjmuhhw@126.com.

Funding

National High‑Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022‑PUMCH‑D‑005National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2404805National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to compare sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO

methods15 mL 5% NaHCO

resultA total of 20 pair bolus injections from 16 mechanically ventilated patients were obtained. Compared to NaHCO

conclusionEIT with NaHCO

Indexed as

Contrast MediaLungPerfusion ImagingRespiratory InsufficiencySodium BicarbonateSodium ChlorideTomographyAgedCritical IllnessElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialContrast MediaSodium BicarbonateSodium ChlorideContrast agentElectrical impedance tomographyRegional lung perfusion

Identifiers

PMID40269841
PMCPMC12016440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.