Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269838›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Evaluation of intermittent hemodialysis therapy in the bypass mode in dogs with chronic kidney disease in uremic crisis.

Maria Gabriela Picelli de Azevedo, Suellen Rodrigues Maia, Reiner Silveira de Moraes, Silvano Salgueiro Geraldes, Henry David Mogollón García, Alessandra Melchert, Regina Kiomi Takahira, Adriano Sakai Okamoto, Raphael Lucio Andreatti Filho, Priscylla Tatiana Chalfun Guimarães-Okamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria Gabriela Picelli de AzevedoDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suellen Rodrigues MaiaDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. suellen.r.maia@unesp.br.
Reiner Silveira de MoraesDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Silvano Salgueiro GeraldesDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Henry David Mogollón GarcíaInstitute of Biology, Campinas State University, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alessandra MelchertDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Regina Kiomi TakahiraDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriano Sakai OkamotoDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raphael Lucio Andreatti FilhoDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Priscylla Tatiana Chalfun Guimarães-OkamotoDepartment of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Funding Code 001.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the safety of intermittent hemodialysis via the bypass mode in dogs with chronic kidney disease during uremic crisis.

resultsFourteen dogs with chronic kidney disease in uremic crisis were selected. The dogs were allocated into two experimental groups: intermittent hemodialysis without bypass mode (IHD group without bypass) and intermittent hemodialysis with bypass mode (IHD group with bypass). Data were collected during the first dialysis session at 10 min pre-session (M0), 30 min (M1), 60 min (M2), 120 min (M3), 180 min (M4), and 240 min (M5) after the session began and 10 min post-session (M6). An increase in rectal temperature was observed at certain moments in both groups. The hemogram revealed a decrease in red blood cells, total protein, and platelets in both groups, whereas hemoglobin and hematocrit decreased at M6 only in the IHD group with bypass. Urea, creatinine, and phosphorus were reduced at M6 in both groups. An increase in blood pH, sodium bicarbonate, and excess base at M6 (10 min post-session) was observed in both groups. The IHD group with bypass exhibited a significantly lower body weight. No significant differences were observed in session time or final URR between the groups.

conclusionsThe results of this study support the hypothesis that IHD with the bypass mode is safe and effective in CKD dogs with uremic crisis. This approach minimizes complications such as dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) while not causing hemodynamic or laboratory impairments under the executed conditions.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicUremiaAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleBypassF4 filtersIntermittent HemodialysisKidneySafety

Identifiers

PMID40269838
PMCPMC12016138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.