ArticleBMC oral health2025
Clinical study of dynamic navigation-assisted immediate implant placement in posterior maxillary alveolar bone defects.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Freehand, Static, and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Pooled it
- Dynamic navigation versus conventional 3D-printed guides in implant surgery: A randomised controlled trial.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy and clinical effect of immediate implant placement(IIP) using real-time dynamic navigation in the posterior maxilla with alveolar bone defects.
methodsA total of 55 patients with 72 implants placed in the posterior maxillary region with alveolar bone defects were retrospectively analyzed between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2024. The study was divided into two groups, navigation group and freehand implant group.The preoperative planning implant data and postoperative CBCT data of the actual implant were imported into the dynamic navigation accuracy verification software, and the deviations of the actual implant neck, root, depth and angle were calculated and reported. Clinical indicators including implant deviation, initial stability, implant success were recorded.
resultsThere were 38 implants in the navigation group and 34 in the freehand group. All implants were successfully placed without serious complications such as perforation of the maxillary sinus mucosa. The initial stability of the implant in the navigation group was (28.53 ± 5.81)N.cm and (18.47 ± 3.64)N.cm, respectively. The initial stability of the implant in the navigation group was higher than that in the free hand group (P < 0.05). The deviations in the cervical, root, depth, and angulation of the navigation group were all significantly smaller than those of the free-hand implant group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The median follow-up was 29.6 ± 11.2 months and the implant success rate was 100%.
conclusionsImmediate implant placement in the maxillary posterior region with bone deficiency assisted by real-time dynamic navigation can achieve good implant accuracy and satisfactory clinical results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dynamic navigation is an advantage for the IIP of an alveolar bone defect in the posterior region of the maxilla.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.