Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269824›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Integrating AI in medical education: a comprehensive study of medical students' attitudes, concerns, and behavioral intentions.

Shuo Duan, Chunyu Liu, Tianhua Rong, Yixin Zhao, Baoge Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuo Duan *Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4Th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Chunyu Liu *Peking University Peoples Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
Tianhua RongBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4Th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yixin ZhaoPeking University Peoples Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China. zhaoyixin16@163.com.
Baoge LiuBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4Th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China. baogeliu@hotmail.com.

Funding

Peking University Health Science Center Medical Education Research Funding Project 2024ZD07the Capital Medical University Education and Teaching Reform Research Funding Project 2023JYY226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analyze medical students' perceptions, trust, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education, and explore their willingness to integrate AI in learning and teaching practices.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was performed with undergraduate and postgraduate medical students from two medical universities in Beijing. Data were collected between October and early November 2024 via a self-designed questionnaire that covered seven main domains: Awareness of AI, Expectations and concerns about AI, Importance of AI in education, Potential challenges and risks of AI in education and learning, The role and potential of AI in education, Perceptions of generative AI, and Behavioral intentions and plans for AI use in medical education.

resultsA total of 586 students participated in the survey, 553 valid responses were collected, giving an effective response rate of 94.4%. The majority of participants reported familiarity with AI concepts, whereas only 43.5% had an understanding of AI applications specific to medical education. Postgraduate students exhibited significantly higher levels of awareness of AI tools in medical contexts compared with undergraduate students (p < 0.001). Gender differences were also observed, with male students showing more enthusiasm and higher engagement with AI technologies than female students (p < 0.001). Female students expressed greater concerns regarding privacy, data security, and potential ethical issues related to AI in medical education than male students (p < 0.05). Male students or postgraduate students showed stronger behavioral intentions to integrate AI tools in their future learning and teaching practices.

conclusionsMedical students exhibit optimistic yet cautious attitudes toward the application of AI in medical education. They acknowledge the potential of AI to enhance educational efficiency, but remain mindful of the associated privacy and ethical risks. Strengthening AI education and training and balancing technological advancements with ethical considerations will be crucial in facilitating the deep integration of AI in medical education.

trial registrationNot clinical trial.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceAttitudesBehavioral intentionsConcernsMedical education

Identifiers

PMID40269824
PMCPMC12020173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.