ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
The analyses of length and type of bladder injury during cesarean section in patients with or without placenta accreta: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the outcomes of patients with bladder injury during cesarean delivery with or without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). MATERIALS ANT
methodRetrospective case series of all pregnancies complicated by bladder injury during cesarean delivery were evaluated in a tertiary hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. Data of patients' demographic and obstetric parameters including bladder injury, such as length and degree of bladder injury, time of bladder injury occurrence (during entrance of peritoneal cavity, bladder flap dissection, uterine incision, or delivery) were all recorded. Patients with bladder injury were also divided into two group as with PAS (+) or without PAS (-), recorded data were compared between groups.
resultsBladder injury was detected in 72 (0.02%) of 35,465 total cesarean section operations. There were 45 (7.5%) patients with bladder injuries in the PAS group. The mean length of bladder injury (cm) in PAS (+) group and PAS (-) group were 5.20 ± 1.98 and 3.74 ± 1.63, respectively (p = 0.002). The gestational age at delivery and birth weight were significantly higher in PAS (-) group, while hospital stay was longer in PAS (+) group. The occurrence of bladder injury during flap dissection was significantly higher in PAS (+) group. However, in PAS (-) group the bladder injury during uterine incision or delivery was significantly higher (p < 0.001). The bladder injury rates in emergency cesarean sections were higher in two groups than elective cases.
conclusionsThe risk of bladder injury is higher in emergency cesarean sections, regardless of PAS status. Longer and more severe bladder injuries are seen in the PAS group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.