Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269781›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Novel mRNA biomarker-based liquid biopsy for the detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Jong-Chan Lee, Sung Won Kang, Eun-Jin Sim, Jin-Sik Bae, Seong-Mo Koo, Mun-Sub Byoun, Serin Kwon, Seoi Hong, Yunji Kim, Yuna Youn and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Liquid Biopsy Revolutionizes the Precise Management of Tumors Across the Entire Course: Current Situation and Future Prospects].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jong-Chan Lee *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sung Won Kang *Research Center, HuVet bio Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Eun-Jin SimResearch Center, HuVet bio Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Sik BaeResearch Center, HuVet bio Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Seong-Mo KooResearch Center, HuVet bio Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Mun-Sub ByounResearch Center, HuVet bio Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Serin KwonDepartment of Life Science, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Seoi HongDepartment of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Yunji KimDepartment of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Yuna YounDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Kwangrok JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Jaihwan KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyoung Hwa JeongResearch Center, HuVet bio Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Jihie Kim *Department of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea. jihie.kim@dgu.edu.
Jin-Hyeok Hwang *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. woltoong@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

HuVet Bio Inc non-applicableIITP(Institute for Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation) IITP-2025-RS-2023-00254592MSIT(Ministry of Science and ICT) IITP-2025-2020-0-01789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies and most often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Identification of markers for the early diagnosis of PDAC is crucial. In this study, we aimed to identify novel mRNA biomarkers for diagnosing PDAC, focusing on early-stage tumorigenesis and associated immunological changes.

methodsBlood samples and clinical information from 1,963 individuals were obtained from a single tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2021. Candidate mRNA biomarkers were identified through literature review, and their expression levels in buffy coat samples were measured using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Machine learning-based feature selection confirmed the final biomarker panel, which was tested using an independent dataset for diagnostic performance.

resultsIn total, 1,504 individuals (417 patients with PDAC and 1,087 non-disease controls) were eligible for the study. Among the 55 candidate biomarkers identified, 15 mRNAs (CCL5, CCR5, CLEC7A, CXCL8, CXCR2, CXCR4, FOXP3, IFNA1, IFNL1, PTGES, PTGES2, PTGS2, SLC27A2, TNF, and VEGFA) were selected based on their diagnostic performance in distinguishing PDAC from control groups. The final model, HELP-15 (Human Early Liquid biopsy for PDAC), identified all PDAC stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.956) in the test set. For resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC), the AUC was 0.968, compared to 0.910 for carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9). The combined model of the panel and CA19-9 achieved an AUC of 0.985 in patients with RPC. For all PDAC stages in patients with normal CA19-9 levels, the AUC of the panel was 0.967, whereas CA19-9 alone or in combination with the panel had AUCs of 0.658 and 0.885, respectively.

conclusionCompared to CA19-9, the mRNA biomarker panel, HELP-15, improved diagnostic performance in patients with RPC, particularly in those with normal CA19-9 levels.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsRNA, MessengerAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorRNA, MessengerBiomarkerBuffy coatLiquid biopsymRNAPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID40269781
PMCPMC12016232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.