Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269759›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Virtual telehealth visits for prenatal checkups during the COVID- 19 pandemic in Japan: a nationwide survey and feasibility study.

Mariya Kobayashi, Satoshi Nakagawa, Yuji Kamei, Takahide Maenaka, Kosuke Hiramatsu, Kazuya Mimura, Toshihiro Kimura, Yutaka Ueda, Makoto Fujii, Masayuki Endo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mariya KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Satoshi NakagawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan. s.nakagawa@gyne.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Yuji KameiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Takahide MaenakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Kosuke HiramatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Kazuya MimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Toshihiro KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Yutaka UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Makoto FujiiDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki EndoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.
Kumiko AdachiDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumie KurokawaCollege of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsugio MaedaJapan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru IkenoueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mamoru TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadashi KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2 - 15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565 - 0871, Japan.

Funding

Health Labor Sciences Research Grant JPMH20CA2032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the use of virtual telehealth visits (VV) for prenatal checkups in Japan during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, identified challenges associated with their use, and assessed the feasibility of future VV implementation for prenatal care.

methodsSurveys were conducted at birthing facilities across Japan and with pregnant women attending Osaka and Keio University hospitals. To assess the feasibility of VV, we compared the self-measured blood pressure, fundal height, urinary test results, and fetal heart rate of pregnant women with those measured by healthcare providers.

resultsWe received responses from 1,096 birthing facilities (49.5% response rate) and 96 women. Only 1.6% of birthing facilities implemented VV, mainly due toto a lack of human resources, costs, and low demand from both patients and healthcare providers. In contrast, 60.2% of pregnant women expressed anxiety about in-person visits during the pandemic, and 36.6% preferred the introduction of VV. The Pearson correlation coefficients between self-measured and provider-measured values systolic and diastolic blood pressure and fundal height were 0.68, 0.58, and 0.87, respectively. The concordance rates for proteinuria and urinary glucose were 91.6% and 98.9%, respectively. However, the correlation for fetal heart rate measurements was poor (-0.04). Bland-Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement ranging from -42.6 to 65.6 bpm, indicating the need for methodological improvement.

conclusionDespite maternal interest, VV has been limitedly implemented in Japan. Our study found that self-measured values, except for fetal heart rate, were highly correlated with those measured by healthcare providers. These findings are important for healthcare providers and government agencies when considering future prenatal checkups.

Indexed as

COVID-19Prenatal CareTelemedicineAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansJapanPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesAntenatal careCOVID- 19FeasibilityNationwide surveyPregnancyPrenatal checkupTelemedicineVirtual telehealth visits

Identifiers

PMID40269759
PMCPMC12020309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.