ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Virtual telehealth visits for prenatal checkups during the COVID- 19 pandemic in Japan: a nationwide survey and feasibility study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated the use of virtual telehealth visits (VV) for prenatal checkups in Japan during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, identified challenges associated with their use, and assessed the feasibility of future VV implementation for prenatal care.
methodsSurveys were conducted at birthing facilities across Japan and with pregnant women attending Osaka and Keio University hospitals. To assess the feasibility of VV, we compared the self-measured blood pressure, fundal height, urinary test results, and fetal heart rate of pregnant women with those measured by healthcare providers.
resultsWe received responses from 1,096 birthing facilities (49.5% response rate) and 96 women. Only 1.6% of birthing facilities implemented VV, mainly due toto a lack of human resources, costs, and low demand from both patients and healthcare providers. In contrast, 60.2% of pregnant women expressed anxiety about in-person visits during the pandemic, and 36.6% preferred the introduction of VV. The Pearson correlation coefficients between self-measured and provider-measured values systolic and diastolic blood pressure and fundal height were 0.68, 0.58, and 0.87, respectively. The concordance rates for proteinuria and urinary glucose were 91.6% and 98.9%, respectively. However, the correlation for fetal heart rate measurements was poor (-0.04). Bland-Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement ranging from -42.6 to 65.6 bpm, indicating the need for methodological improvement.
conclusionDespite maternal interest, VV has been limitedly implemented in Japan. Our study found that self-measured values, except for fetal heart rate, were highly correlated with those measured by healthcare providers. These findings are important for healthcare providers and government agencies when considering future prenatal checkups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.