ArticleBMC genomics2025
Decoding bacterial methylomes in four public health-relevant microbial species: nanopore sequencing enables reproducible analysis of DNA modifications.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth Phase-Related DNA Methylation and Localized DNA Fragment Density Variation inEpigenomes · 2026Article
- Applicability of Nanopore-only whole-genome sequencing forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- From Spatial Epigenomes to Clinical Diagnostics: Integrative Methylomics Across Scales and Modalities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Epigenomics identifies three sources of DNA methylation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- EnDeep4mC predicts DNAGenome research · 2026Article
- How to Unmask an Unknown: The Restriction-Modification SystemInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Epigenetic regulation and antimicrobial resistance: functional roles of DNA methylation.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- From Methylomes to CRISPR Epigenetic Editing: New Paths in Antibiotic Resistance.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A whole-genome sequencing dataset of nanopore raw signals for bacterial genotyping and methylation analysis.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Improving the Transformation Efficiency ofACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Snappy: fast identification of DNA methylation motifs based on oxford nanopore reads.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Overcoming challenges in metagenomic AMR surveillance with nanopore sequencing: a case study on fluoroquinolone resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating bacterial methylation profiles provides essential complementary information to the native DNA sequence, significantly extending our understanding of how DNA modifications influence virulence, antibiotic resistance, and the ability of bacteria to evade the immune system. Recent advancements in real-time Nanopore sequencing and basecalling algorithms have enabled the direct detection of modified bases from raw signal data, eliminating the need for bisulfite treatment of DNA. However, decoding methylation signals remains challenging due to rapid technological and methodological progress. In this study, we focus on public health-relevant bacterial strains to analyze their methylation profiles and identify methylation motifs. Our dataset includes samples from Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, sequenced on the Nanopore GridION platform using the latest flow cell chemistry (R10.4.1) and modification basecalling models (Dorado basecalling SUP model v5). We investigated distinct methylation patterns within and between species, focusing on heavily modified genes or genomic regions. Our results reveal distinct species-specific methylation profiles, with each strain exhibiting unique modification patterns. We developed a modular pipeline using Nextflow and the Nanopore Modkit tool to streamline the detection of methylated motifs. We compared the results with outputs from MicrobeMod, a recent toolkit for exploring prokaryotic methylation and base modifications in nanopore sequencing. Our pipeline is publicly available for further use (github.com/rki-mf1/ont-methylation). We identified known methylation motifs already described in the literature and novel de novo motifs, providing deeper insights into the diversity of bacterial DNA modifications. Furthermore, we identified genomic regions that are extensively methylated, which could have implications for bacterial behavior and pathogenicity. We also assess improvements in basecalling accuracy, specifically how methylated bases can influence neighboring basecalls. Recent advances in basecalling models, particularly v5 models as part of Dorado, have reduced these issues, improving the reliability of methylation detection in bacterial genomes. In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of current nanopore sequencing tools for detecting DNA modifications in prokaryotes. By making our pipeline and results publicly available, we facilitate further research into bacterial DNA modifications and their role in microbial pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.