ReviewMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
New insights into biomarkers and risk stratification to predict hepatocellular cancer.
Review in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative gut microbial ecology: a new frontier for improving the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma surgery.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- A novel prognostic model based on MVIRGs identifies ANGPT2 as a key target driving the malignant progression of HCC.Biological procedures online · 2026Article
- Potential of Dietary Agent Daidzein in Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Opportunities and Challenges.Cancers · 2026Review
- Constitutive AMPK activation prevents hepatocellular carcinoma development through inhibition of HNF4α activity.Science advances · 2026Article
- MRI-based clinical-radiomics-habitat model for predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with HAIC.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Glycosylation of B7-H3 Promotes CD8International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Biomarkers for early identification of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): a narrative review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Multicenter Validation of a RAR-Based Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Progression in HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third major cause of cancer death worldwide, with more than a doubling of incidence over the past two decades in the United States. Yet, the survival rate remains less than 20%, often due to late diagnosis at advanced stages. Current HCC screening approaches are serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing and ultrasound (US) of cirrhotic patients. However, these remain suboptimal, particularly in the setting of underlying obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH), which are also rising in incidence. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel biomarkers that can stratify risk and predict early diagnosis of HCC, which is curable. Advances in liver cancer biology, multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence, and precision algorithms have facilitated the development of promising candidates, with several emerging from completed phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. This review highlights the performance of these novel biomarkers and algorithms from a mechanistic perspective and provides new insight into how pathological processes can be detected through blood-based biomarkers. Through human studies compiled with animal models and mechanistic insight in pathways such as the TGF-β pathway, the biological progression from chronic liver disease to cirrhosis and HCC can be delineated. This integrated approach with new biomarkers merit further validation to refine HCC screening and improve early detection and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.