ArticleElectrophoresis2025
Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical Behavior of Neratinib at a Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode: Role of Tween 20 in Interfacial Signal Enhancement.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Combining Underpotential Deposition and Soft-Template to Construct Ordered Mesoporous PdSb Nanocubes for Selective Ethylene Glycol Oxidation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Vanadium Oxide Cocatalysts on the Photocatalytic Performance of Strontium Titanates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Lipid Nanoparticles with Stiripentol and Cannabidiol Oil: From Rational Optimization to Preclinical Characterization.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Aliphatic Chain-Derived Fluorescein Aggregates for Surfactants Discrimination and CMC Determination.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements.Electrophoresis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.