Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269627›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2025

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements.

Yuri Chenyakin, David Da Yong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuri ChenyakinDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
David Da Yong ChenDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m

Indexed as

MicellesSurface-Active AgentsCetrimoniumCetrimonium CompoundsCholic AcidsElectrophoresis, CapillarySodium Dodecyl SulfateTemperature3-((3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonium)-1-propanesulfonateCetrimoniumCetrimonium CompoundsCholic AcidsMicellesSodium Dodecyl SulfateSurface-Active Agentscapillary electrophoresis apparatuscritical micelle concentrationstreaming potentialsurface charge densitysurfactantzeta potential

Identifiers

PMID40269627
PMCPMC12449752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.