ArticleNeuro-oncology2025
Phase Ib study with expansion of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03703167 (Phase Ib Trial With Dose Expansion of the Bruton"s Tyrosine Kinase), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase Ib Trial With Dose Expansion of the Bruton"s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib, in Combination With Rituximab and Lenalidomide in Patients With Refractory/Recurrent Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) and Refractory/Recurrent Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (SCNSL)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic orchestration of the primary central nervous system lymphoma microenvironment.Biomarker research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatment options for recurrent/refractory central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma are limited but Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has shown promise. To increase efficacy and reduce resistance, ibrutinib was combined with lenalidomide in a preclinical study and rituximab (R2I) in a phase Ib trial with expansion.
methodsIbrutinib 560 mg (dose level 1) or 840 mg (levels 2-4) was administered daily; lenalidomide was dosed on days 1-21 at 10 mg (level 1 + 2), 15 mg (level 3), or 20 mg (level 4) daily; rituximab 500 mg/m2 was administered every 28 days. Rituximab was given for 6 cycles, lenalidomide for 12 cycles, and ibrutinib ongoing.
results25 patients were enrolled (3 each into dose levels 1-3; 6 into level 4; and 10 into the expansion cohort at level 4). The median age was 67 years (range 41-85) and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1 (range 0-2). Patients had a median of 2 prior regimens (range 1-5). Common adverse events were thrombocytopenia, rash, and lymphopenia. No aspergillosis or grade 5 toxicities were observed. After 12.8 months of median follow-up, 20/25 (80%) showed a response with a median time to best response of 60 days (range, 25-615). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 months (95% CI: 2.4-not reached) with a PFS12m of 37% (95% CI: 22%-63%). Median overall survival has not been reached. Patients with rash during treatment had improved PFS (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05-0.55, P-value = .003).
conclusionsR2I was tolerated well with high response rates and a short time to best respond. Median PFS was limited but 1/3 of patients had durable responses >12 months. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03703167).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.