Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269576›Full record

SynthesisClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2025

The Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Anatomy: A Systematic Review.

Tanisha S Joseph, Shelleen Gowrie, Michael J Montalbano, Stephan Bandelow, Mark Clunes, Aaron S Dumont, Joe Iwanaga, R Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanisha S JosephDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.
Shelleen GowrieDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.
Michael J MontalbanoDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.
Stephan BandelowDepartment of Physiology, Neuroscience & Behavioral Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.
Mark ClunesDepartment of Physiology, Neuroscience & Behavioral Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.
Aaron S DumontDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.
Joe IwanagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.
R Shane TubbsDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-1047
Marios LoukasDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St George's University, School of Medicine, Saint George's, Grenada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-6657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomy education is a cornerstone of medical training and relies on cadaveric dissection and 2D illustrations. Technological advancements and integrated curricula have reduced the focus on detailed anatomy and challenged educators to engage Generation Z learners with interactive, tech-driven methods. Advanced imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) offer a solution, providing virtual dissection simulations and personalized learning tools that mimic 3D anatomy and adapt to individual student needs. Machine learning, a subset of AI, enhances this process by enabling predictive analytics, adaptive feedback, and tailored learning pathways based on performance data, significantly improving anatomical comprehension. Despite its benefits, AI integration raises concerns about over-reliance on technology, biases, and diminished human interaction in training. This review examines AI's transformative potential in anatomy education while emphasizing the need for balanced implementation and ethical oversight. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, utilizing PubMed and backward citation searches. The search yielded 56 studies, with 47 additional articles from citations, resulting in 61 included studies. These explored AI applications such as virtual dissection simulations, machine learning algorithms for adaptive feedback, and gamified learning experiences, which were shown to enhance engagement, personalize learning, and improve anatomical understanding. Concerns about over-reliance on AI and the loss of human interaction were also raised. AI has the potential to enhance anatomy education, but careful consideration of ethical and practical implications is essential. A balanced approach combining traditional methods with AI and robust oversight is crucial for effective integration.

Indexed as

AnatomyArtificial IntelligenceHumansanatomical educationartificial intelligencehumansmachine learningsimulation

Identifiers

PMID40269576
PMCPMC12163106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.