ArticleTransfusion2025
Incorrect blood typing and mis-transfusion due to low-titer group O whole blood resuscitation.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incorrect blood typing and mis-transfusion due to low-titer group O whole blood resuscitation.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResuscitation strategies for massive hemorrhage increasingly involve the use of low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) due to evidence suggesting improved patient outcomes. However, the potential risk of incorrect ABO typing following LTOWB administration, possibly leading to mis-transfusion, remains insufficiently explored. This case series aims to highlight the potential risk of ABO mistyping associated with LTOWB transfusions in trauma settings. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed three cases involving trauma patients who received LTOWB transfusions at a high-volume urban Level 1 Trauma Center. ABO and RhD typing were performed using automated column agglutination technology (Ortho ID-MTS™), and discordant typing results prompted further investigations to confirm patients' true ABO type and identify mis-transfusions.
resultsAll three patients initially received LTOWB due to traumatic hemorrhage. Initial ABO typing after LTOWB administration incorrectly identified the patients as group O. Follow-up investigations later confirmed their true blood types as group A. Two cases resulted in subsequent inadvertent transfusions of ABO-incompatible plasma. Although no severe adverse clinical outcomes occurred, these events were reported to regulatory bodies as biologic product deviations. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight a rare but clinically significant risk of ABO typing errors following LTOWB transfusion, primarily due to contamination of patient samples with donor blood. Such errors carry the potential for acute hemolytic reactions, underscoring the critical need for strict adherence to sampling protocols. Whenever possible, ABO typing should be performed prior to LTOWB administration, and samples should be drawn from a site contralateral to the transfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.