ReviewThe New phytologist2025
Computational modeling of plant root development: the art and the science.
Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Regeneration: Influencing Factors, Regulatory Networks, and Epigenetic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Promise of Synthetic Biology for Redesigning Plant Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Plant root development, like any developmental process, arises from the interplay between processes like gene expression, cell-cell signaling, cell growth and division, and tissue mechanics, which unfold over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales. Computational models are uniquely suited to integrate these different processes and spatio-temporal scales to investigate how their interplay determines developmental outcomes and have become part of mainstream plant developmental research. Still, for non-modeling experts, it often remains unclear how models are built, why a particular modeling approach was chosen, and how to interpret and value model outcomes. This review attempts to explain the science behind the art of model building, illustrating the simplifications that are often made to keep models simple to understand and when these are and are not justified. Similarly, it discusses when it is safe to ignore certain processes like growth or tissue mechanics and when it is not. Additionally, this review discusses a range of major breakthrough modeling articles. Their approaches are linked to classical concepts and models in developmental biology like the French flag positional information gradient of Lewis Wolpert and the repetitive patterning mechanism proposed by Turing, in addition to highlighting the lessons they taught us on plant root development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.