Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269515›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Bioinformatic approaches to blood and tissue microbiome analyses: challenges and perspectives.

Jammi Prasanthi Sirasani, Cory Gardner, Gihwan Jung, Hyunju Lee, Tae-Hyuk Ahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jammi Prasanthi SirasaniProgram of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Cory GardnerDepartment of Computer Science, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Gihwan JungDepartment of Computer Science, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Hyunju LeeAI Graduate School, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2389-7183
Tae-Hyuk AhnProgram of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7281-9459

Funding

National Science Foundation 2430236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in next-generation sequencing have resulted in a growing understanding of the microbiome and its role in human health. Unlike traditional microbiome analysis, blood and tissue microbiome analyses focus on the detection and characterization of microbial DNA in blood and tissue, previously considered a sterile environment. In this review, we discuss the challenges and methodologies associated with analyzing these samples, particularly emphasizing blood and tissue microbiome research. Key preprocessing steps-including the removal of ribosomal RNA, host DNA, and other contaminants-are critical to reducing noise and accurately capturing microbial evidence. We also explore how taxonomic profiling tools, machine learning, and advanced normalization techniques address contamination and low microbial biomass, thereby improving reliability. While it offers the potential for identifying microbial involvement in systemic diseases previously undetectable by traditional methods, this methodology also carries risks and lacks universal acceptance due to concerns over reliability and interpretation errors. This paper critically reviews these factors, highlighting both the promise and pitfalls of using blood and tissue microbiome analyses as a tool for biomarker discovery.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMicrobiotaBiomarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningBiomarkersblood and tissuecontaminationmetagenomicsmicrobiome analysispreprocessingtaxonomic profiling

Identifiers

PMID40269515
PMCPMC12018304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.