Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269477›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2025

A general diagnostic modelling framework for forced-choice assessments.

Pablo Nájera, Rodrigo S Kreitchmann, Scarlett Escudero, Francisco J Abad, Jimmy de la Torre, Miguel A Sorrel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A general diagnostic modelling framework for forced-choice assessments.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo NájeraDepartment of Psychology, UNINPSI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-2744
Rodrigo S KreitchmannDepartment of Methodology in Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-9828
Scarlett EscuderoDepartment of Social Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0008-8836-2933
Francisco J AbadDepartment of Social Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-2709
Jimmy de la TorreFaculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong City, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-3863
Miguel A SorrelDepartment of Social Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-5217

Funding

MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF/EU under the project "Computerized adaptive tests based on new assessment formats" (reference: PID2022-137258NB-I00)UAM-IIC Chair Psychometric Models and ApplicationsUniversidad Pontificia Comillas (2024 Call for Funding of Internal Research Projects: "Advancements in cognitive diagnosis models for formative assessments")
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic classification modelling (DCM) is a family of restricted latent class models often used in educational settings to assess students' strengths and weaknesses. Recently, there has been growing interest in applying DCM to noncognitive traits in fields such as clinical and organizational psychology, as well as personality profiling. To address common response biases in these assessments, such as social desirability, Huang (2023, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83, 146) adopted the forced-choice (FC) item format within the DCM framework, developing the FC-DCM. This model assumes that examinees with no clear preference for any statements in an FC block will choose completely at random. Additionally, the unique parametrization of the FC-DCM poses challenges for integration with established DCM frameworks in the literature. In the present study, we enhance the capabilities of DCM by introducing a general diagnostic framework for FC assessments. We present an adaptation of the G-DINA model to accommodate FC responses. Simulation results show that the G-DINA model provides accurate classifications, item parameter estimates and attribute correlations, outperforming the FC-DCM in realistic scenarios where item discrimination varies. A real FC assessment example further illustrates the better model fit of the G-DINA. Practical recommendations for using the FC format in diagnostic assessments of noncognitive traits are provided.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorEducational MeasurementModels, StatisticalPsychometricsComputer SimulationHumansLatent Class Analysisdiagnostic classificationforced‐choice assessmentslatent classnoncognitive traits

Identifiers

PMID40269477
PMCPMC12516110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.