Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40269334›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025

Patients' Perspectives on Participation in an Effectiveness Study on Footwear Modification for the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Study.

Carla Braam, Sabine Kloprogge, Dieuwke Schiphof, Joyce B J van Meurs, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Marienke van Middelkoop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carla BraamDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University of Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7033-7660
Sabine KloproggeDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University of Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dieuwke SchiphofDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University of Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Joyce B J van MeursDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University of Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University of Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marienke van MiddelkoopDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University of Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 10310012120003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of footwear modifications for the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint osteoarthritis (OA) compared to usual general practitioner (GP) care has never been studied. Understanding patients' perspectives is essential for assessing the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on this topic. Our objective is to explore experiences, expectations, beliefs, and opinions of patients with the first MTP joint OA regarding symptoms and limitations, healthcare management, footwear intervention, and research participation for designing a successful future effectiveness trial.

methodA qualitative research design was embedded within a feasibility pilot study for the recruitment of participants diagnosed with the first MTP joint OA. Qualitative data from semistructured interviews were categorized analyzed.

resultsAll participants (n = 10) experienced limitations on the activity and participation level due to pain symptoms in the first MTP joint. Patients experienced varying approaches and treatment outcomes in primary and secondary healthcare, leading to both positive and negative perspectives. Most participants highlighted the importance of the cosmetic appearance of modified footwear, indicating that this is crucial for compliance with the intervention. Participants showed willingness to participate in an RCT, with strong preference for randomization into an intervention group with a modified footwear alongside usual GP care rather than GP care alone.

conclusionOur study identified key considerations for designing a successful future trial, including recruiting incident cases, offering the deferred footwear intervention to the control group, providing clear information during recruitment and randomization phase, and the significance of the cosmetic appearance of modified footwear for patients with the first MTP joint OA.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesMetatarsophalangeal JointOsteoarthritisPatient ParticipationShoesAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomefirst metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritisfootwear modificationsgeneral practicepatients' perspectivesprimary healthcarequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID40269334
PMCPMC12018162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.