ArticleScientific reports2025
Peritumoral features for assessing invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A radiomics-based nomogram for preoperatively predicting the invasiveness of nodular lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- A CT-based radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the predictive value of radiomics features from different peritumoral ranges for the invasiveness of ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma using various machine learning models. This retrospective study included 317 patients with 323 ground-glass nodules diagnosed as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) at Benxi Central Hospital (January 2019-December 2023). Radiomic features from tumor margins of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm were extracted. Eight machine learning models were constructed following dimensionality reduction. The models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. All models had area under the curve values > 0.75, effectively distinguishing between MIA and IAC. Only the decision tree model showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); no differences were found between the other models (P > 0.05). In the training set, the 1-mm margin model achieved the highest ranking, followed by the 2-, 4-, 5-, and 3-mm models. In the validation group, the 3-mm margin model ranked the highest, followed by the 2-, 1-, 4-, and 5-mm models, with no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). All machine learning models demonstrated good predictive performance for both MIA and IAC. Radiomic features from 1 to 5-mm margins showed strong predictive value, though no optimal margin range was identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.