ArticleScientific reports2025
Combination of skin sympathetic nerve activity and urine biomarkers in improving diagnostic accuracy for urge urinary incontinence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Diagnostic Model Combining Urinary Biomarkers and Clinical Parameters to Improve Diagnostic Performance in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Development of a predictive nomogram for treatment response to urethral botulinum toxin A injection in women with non-neurogenic dysfunctional voiding.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urge urinary incontinence (UUI) poses diagnostic challenges due to subjective assessments and limited biomarkers. This study aims to enhance accuracy by integrating skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) with urine biomarkers. A prospective analysis included 36 UUI and 36 non-UUI participants. All participants underwent measurements of SKNA and evaluations of nine urine biomarkers, both with and without urinary creatinine correction. Logistic regression and support vector machine with L1 penalty were applied to SKNA and urine biomarker measurements. Six-fold stratified cross-validation ensuring equitable distribution of UUI positive and negative samples was adopted. Nonzero model weights were extracted to identify most relevant biomarkers. Elevated SKNA and calibrated urine biomarkers were observed in UUI participants. Calibrated urinary biomarkers alone achieves better accuracy than using raw biomarkers. Integration of SKNA and calibrated biomarkers demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for UUI (AUC = 0.80 ± 0.07; sensitivity = 0.72, specificity = 0.83) compared to using SKNA alone, raw or calibrated urine biomarkers alone, and alternative combinations. Baseline SKNA, calibrated MCP-1, MIP-1β, and IP-10 emerged as promising biomarkers. In conclusion, combining SKNA and urinary creatinine-normalized biomarkers yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy for UUI. This study proposes an innovative diagnostic algorithm, advancing UUI diagnostics by integrating autonomic function parameters and urine biomarker analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.