ArticleScientific reports2025
Acute muscle excitation response across various bench press ranges of motion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute effects of foam rolling vs. passive rest following a single bout of complex contrast training.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Electromyographic activity during bench press differs by attentional focus strategy and sport: a cross-sectional comparison of bodybuilding, powerlifting, and paralympic powerlifting.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Acute effects of foam rolling on jump performance and neuromuscular responses following resistance exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined muscle excitation using surface electromyography (sEMG) during different ranges of motion (ROM) in the bench press. Given the limited research on upper-body muscle excitation across ROMs, this study aimed to establish reference values for muscle excitation in distinct bench press ROMs. Nineteen male participants performed a 10-repetition maximum (10RM) bench press across three ROMs: full ROM, upper-half ROM, and lower-half ROM. sEMG measurements were taken on the pectoralis major (PM), triceps brachii (TB), and anterior deltoid (AD). Mean and peak EMG amplitudes were analyzed. Significant differences in mean muscle excitation were observed across all muscles (p < 0.001-0.002). The upper-half ROM elicited the highest mean excitation for the TB, while both partial ROMs resulted in greater excitation for the PM and AD compared to the full ROM. Peak muscle excitation was significantly greater in the PM sternocostal 15% region during the upper-half ROM. Additionally, the TB long and lateral heads showed significantly higher peak EMG values in the upper-half ROM than in the other conditions. These results suggest that ROM variations in the bench press lead to distinct muscle excitation patterns. This insight may inform future research on ROM's effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.