ArticleScientific reports2025
The science behind the lifesum app: an intervention design analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wellness is an increasingly important part of public health and can prevent both disease and death. Diet and nutrition are important factors that contribute to wellness and predict health outcomes. Adhering to healthy diets is notoriously difficult for many, and some support is often required. Increasingly, that support may be found in the shape of an app in a smartphone. One such app is Lifesum, with some 65 million users worldwide. Lifesum adopts a more holistic approach to nutrition and well-being, and adopted an evidence-based approach to its development. The aim of this study was to describe the scientific, theoretical basis for the Lifesum app and contribute to advancing science in the field of wellness app development. This was an intervention design analysis, designed to describe the theoretical model and intervention theory used to create the Lifesum app in its current embodiment. A pragmatic theoretical model describing behaviour change in the context of healthy eating was devised based on findings in literature. Factors that drive unhealthy eating behaviours, but that were malleable and whose mechanisms of change were feasible to implement, were identified and used to form an intervention theory. The theoretical model and the intervention theory could then guide the implementation of the Lifesum app, illustrated by a logic model. The theoretical model emphasizes personal goal-attainment and motivation as keys to establishing and maintaining healthy eating behaviours, with proximal outcomes being nutrition knowledge, mindfulness about eating and macro-nutrient balance. Nutrition knowledge is achieved through the provision of nutrition information from a vast database on food items, easily available. Continuous feedback on food choices made will enhance this knowledge and a greater awareness of the impact of nutrition on health remains desirable. A more mindful disposition regarding foods is achieved through support in terms of tracking food intake continuously, as well as recommending meals or recipes. After collecting user preferences on health status, biometrics and goals, these meal plans and recipes can be made to offer the optimal macro-nutrient distribution for each individual user. A theoretical model for diet-related behavior change was developed and key dietary issues were identified, outlining mechanisms for positive impact. These insights informed a mechanistic description of the Lifesum app, providing a foundation for future research on intervention outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.