ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid segmentation and classification CAD framework for automated myocardial infarction prediction from MRI images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based myocardial infarction detection using echocardiography.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Advanced detection of coronary artery disease using a GAN-transformer model on plasma cytokine profiles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Medical Spine Sagittal MRI Dataset for Segmentation and Foraminal Stenosis detection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Ensemble Transformer Framework for Breast Cancer Detection in Ultrasound Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting tourism growth in Saudi Arabia with machine learning models for vision 2030 perspective.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid vision transformer with ensemble CNN framework for cervical cancer diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- CervSpineNet: a hybrid deep learning-based approach for the segmentation of cervical spinous processes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) is critical for preserving cardiac function and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention. This study proposes an annovaitive computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the simultaneous segmentation and classification of MI using MRI images. The system is evaluated under two primary approaches: a serial approach, where segmentation is first applied to extract image patches for subsequent classification, and a parallel approach, where segmentation and classification are performed concurrently using full MRI images. The multi-class segmentation model identifies four key heart regions: left ventricular cavity (LV), normal myocardium (Myo), myocardial infarction (MI), and persistent microvascular obstruction (MVO). The classification stage employs three AI-based strategies: a single deep learning model, feature-based fusion of multiple AI models, and a hybrid ensemble model incorporating the Vision Transformer (ViT). Both segmentation and classification models are trained and validated on the EMIDEC MRI dataset using five-fold cross-validation. The adopted ResU-Net achieves high F1-scores for segmentation: 91.12% (LV), 88.39% (Myo), 80.08% (MI), and 68.01% (MVO). For classification, the hybrid CNN-ViT model in the parallel approach demonstrates superior performance, achieving 98.15% accuracy and a 98.63% F1-score. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed CAD system for real-world clinical applications, offering a robust tool to assist healthcare professionals in accurate MI diagnosis, improved treatment planning, and enhanced patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.